Metacyclic pp-groups of order p4k+4p^{4k+4} with unbounded class and nonordinary mixed varieties

10.4

Problem

For a fixed prime pp, does sufficiently large nilpotency class force the mixed variety generated by a finite pp-group to be an ordinary variety?

∃cp∀G finite p-group,cl⁡(G)≥cp⟹mvar⁡(G) ordinary  ?\exists c_p\quad\forall G\text{ finite }p\text{-group},\quad \operatorname{cl}(G)\ge c_p \Longrightarrow\operatorname{mvar}(G)\text{ ordinary}\;?

The prime must remain fixed while the nilpotency classes grow.

Mixed identities and the class threshold

Let X={x0,x1,…}X=\{x_0,x_1,\ldots\} and write G[X]=G∗F(X)G[X]=G*F(X). For a homomorphism ϕ:G→H\phi:G\to H and a map ξ:X→H\xi:X\to H, denote by

ev⁡ϕ,ξ:G[X]⟶H\operatorname{ev}_{\phi,\xi}:G[X]\longrightarrow H

the homomorphism extending ϕ\phi and ξ\xi. Put

IG[X]={w∈G[X]:ev⁡1G,ξ(w)=1 for every ξ:X→G}.I_G[X]=\{w\in G[X]:\operatorname{ev}_{1_G,\xi}(w)=1 \text{ for every }\xi:X\to G\}.

Following Anashin (1), the mixed variety generated by GG is defined by

H∈mvar⁡(G)⟺∃ϕ:G→Hev⁡ϕ,ξ(w)=1(w∈IG[X], ξ:X→H).(3) \tag{3} H\in\operatorname{mvar}(G) \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad \exists\phi:G\to H\quad \operatorname{ev}_{\phi,\xi}(w)=1 \quad(w\in I_G[X],\ \xi:X\to H).

The same coefficient homomorphism must work for all identities, and it need not be injective. An ordinary variety is a class defined by a set of words in F(X)F(X), without coefficients.

Problem 10.4 of the Kourovka Notebook (2) asks whether, for a fixed prime pp, the mixed variety generated by an arbitrary finite pp-group of sufficiently large nilpotency class is an ordinary variety. Anashin (1, p. 176) already gives the class-two example

⟨a,b∣ap=bp2=1, a−1ba=b1+p⟩(p odd),\langle a,b\mid a^p=b^{p^2}=1,\ a^{-1}ba=b^{1+p}\rangle \qquad(p\text{ odd}),

which satisfies xp[x,a−1]=1x^p[x,a^{-1}]=1 but generates a nonordinary mixed variety. We use a principal unit congruent to 11 modulo p2p^2 to obtain unbounded nilpotency class for each fixed prime, including p=2p=2. Throughout,

[x,y]=x−1y−1xy,γ1(G)=G,γj+1(G)=[γj(G),G].[x,y]=x^{-1}y^{-1}xy, \qquad \gamma_1(G)=G,\qquad \gamma_{j+1}(G)=[\gamma_j(G),G].

Theorem 1. For every prime pp and every integer k≥0k\geq0, there is a finite pp-group Gp,kG_{p,k} such that

∣Gp,k∣=p4k+4,cl⁡(Gp,k)≥k+2,mvar⁡(Gp,k) is not ordinary.|G_{p,k}|=p^{4k+4},\qquad \operatorname{cl}(G_{p,k})\geq k+2, \qquad \operatorname{mvar}(G_{p,k})\text{ is not ordinary}.

The group is a split extension of a cyclic group of order p2k+3p^{2k+3} by a cyclic group of order p2k+1p^{2k+1}.

Taking kk at least any proposed threshold gives a negative answer to Problem 10.4. The prime remains fixed throughout the construction.

Lemma 2. Suppose that GG contains an abelian subgroup AA, and that r≥1r\geq1 and d∈Gd\in G satisfy

xr[x,d]=1(x∈G).x^r[x,d]=1\qquad(x\in G).

If some a∈Aa\in A satisfies ar≠1a^r\ne1, then mvar⁡(G)\operatorname{mvar}(G) is not ordinary.

Proof. For any homomorphism ϕ:G→A\phi:G\to A, the transported mixed word has value

ar[a,ϕ(d)]=ar≠1.a^r[a,\phi(d)]=a^r\ne1.

Consequently A∉mvar⁡(G)A\notin\operatorname{mvar}(G). The identity homomorphism gives G∈mvar⁡(G)G\in\operatorname{mvar}(G). Ordinary identities restrict to subgroups, since their evaluations commute with the inclusion. Thus no set of ordinary identities defines mvar⁡(G)\operatorname{mvar}(G). ◻

Principal units and geometric sums

Write

Sm(u)=∑i=0m−1ui,S0(u)=0.S_m(u)=\sum_{i=0}^{m-1}u^i,\qquad S_0(u)=0.

We will use

Sm+n(u)=Sm(u)+umSn(u),Smn(u)=Sm(u)Sn(um).(10) \tag{10} S_{m+n}(u)=S_m(u)+u^mS_n(u),\qquad S_{mn}(u)=S_m(u)S_n(u^m).

These identities follow by splitting the sum into consecutive intervals of equal length.

Lemma 3. For every natural number pp and every h≥0h\geq0, there is an integer aha_h such that

(1+p2)ph=1+ph+2(1+pah).(11) \tag{11} (1+p^2)^{p^h}=1+p^{h+2}(1+pa_h).

Moreover, if RR is a commutative ring and u=1+p2z∈Ru=1+p^2z\in R, then for every h≥0h\geq0 there is wh∈Rw_h\in R such that

Sph(u)=ph(1+pwh).(12) \tag{12} S_{p^h}(u)=p^h(1+pw_h).

Here integer coefficients in the second identity are interpreted in RR.

Proof. For (11), take a0=0a_0=0. Suppose the formula holds at hh, and put v=ph+2(1+pah)v=p^{h+2}(1+pa_h). The binomial formula gives an integer zhz_h with

(1+v)p=1+pv+v2zh.(1+v)^p=1+pv+v^2z_h.

Substitution yields

(1+p2)ph+1=1+ph+3(1+p(ah+ph(1+pah)2zh)),(1+p^2)^{p^{h+1}} =1+p^{h+3}\bigl(1+p(a_h+p^h(1+pa_h)^2z_h)\bigr),

which proves the induction.

For (12), every power of uu has the form 1+p2z′1+p^2z': the property is preserved by multiplication. Hence

Sp(uph)=p+p2vhS_p(u^{p^h})=p+p^2v_h

for some vh∈Rv_h\in R. The case h=0h=0 is S1(u)=1S_1(u)=1. If Sph(u)=ph(1+pwh)S_{p^h}(u)=p^h(1+pw_h), then (10) gives

Sph+1(u)=ph(1+pwh)(p+p2vh)=ph+1(1+p(wh+vh+pwhvh)).S_{p^{h+1}}(u) =p^h(1+pw_h)(p+p^2v_h) =p^{h+1}\bigl(1+p(w_h+v_h+pw_hv_h)\bigr).

This proves the assertion without division in RR. ◻

The metacyclic group and its mixed identity

Fix a prime pp and k≥0k\geq0, and put

N=p2k+3,M=p2k+1,r=p2k+2,t=p2k,R=Z/NZ.N=p^{2k+3},\qquad M=p^{2k+1},\qquad r=p^{2k+2},\qquad t=p^{2k},\qquad R=\mathbb Z/N\mathbb Z.

Let q=1+p2∈Rq=1+p^2\in R. Since gcd⁡(1+p2,p)=1\gcd(1+p^2,p)=1, the element qq is a unit. Equation (11), with h=2k+1h=2k+1, gives qM=1q^M=1. Therefore the additive cyclic group C=Z/MZC=\mathbb Z/M\mathbb Z acts on the additive group of RR by

j⋅z=q−jz.j\cdot z=q^{-j}z.

Define G=Gp,k=R⋊CG=G_{p,k}=R\rtimes C. Its multiplication and inverse are

(z,j)(w,ℓ)=(z+q−jw,j+ℓ),(z,j)−1=(−qjz,−j).(19) \tag{19} (z,j)(w,\ell)=(z+q^{-j}w,j+\ell), \qquad (z,j)^{-1}=(-q^jz,-j).

In particular,

∣G∣=NM=p4k+4.|G|=NM=p^{4k+4}.

Thus GG is a finite pp-group and is nilpotent. Put

a=(0,1),b=(1,0),d=a−t=(0,−t).a=(0,1),\qquad b=(1,0),\qquad d=a^{-t}=(0,-t).

All subsequent calculations involving qq and rr take place in RR. We have

rp=0,r2=0,qt=1+r,q−t=1−r.(22) \tag{22} rp=0,\qquad r^2=0,\qquad q^t=1+r,\qquad q^{-t}=1-r.

The first two equalities follow from the modulus NN. For the third, use (11) at h=2kh=2k and rp=0rp=0. The last follows from (1+r)(1−r)=1(1+r)(1-r)=1.

Every power of qq or q−1q^{-1} has the form 1+p2z1+p^2z. For the inverse, this follows directly from

q−1=1−p2q−1;q^{-1}=1-p^2q^{-1};

the set of elements of the form 1+p2z1+p^2z is closed under multiplication. It follows that, for every j∈Cj\in C,

rqj=r,Sr(q−j)=r.(24) \tag{24} rq^j=r,\qquad S_r(q^{-j})=r.

Indeed, the first assertion uses rp=0rp=0, and the second follows from (12) with h=2k+2h=2k+2, again using rp=0rp=0.

For x=(z,j)x=(z,j), induction using (19) gives

xm=(Sm(q−j)z,mj).x^m=(S_m(q^{-j})z,mj).

Since M∣rM\mid r, equations (24) yield

xr=(rz,0).(26) \tag{26} x^r=(rz,0).

Also,

d−1xd=(q−tz,j),d^{-1}xd=(q^{-t}z,j),

and hence

[x,d]=(qj(q−t−1)z,0)=(−rz,0).(28) \tag{28} [x,d]=\bigl(q^j(q^{-t}-1)z,0\bigr)=(-rz,0).

Combining (26) and (28) proves

xr[x,d]=1(x∈G).(29) \tag{29} x^r[x,d]=1\qquad(x\in G).

The subgroup A=R×{0}A=R\times\{0\} is abelian. Its element b=(1,0)b=(1,0) satisfies

br=(r,0)≠(0,0),b^r=(r,0)\ne(0,0),

because 0<r<N0<r<N. Lemma 2 now shows that mvar⁡(G)\operatorname{mvar}(G) is not ordinary.

The lower-central-series bound

For j≥0j\geq0, put vj=(p2j,0)∈Gv_j=(p^{2j},0)\in G. The coordinate multiplication gives

[(z,0),a]=(p2z,0)(z∈R),[vj,a]=vj+1.[(z,0),a]=(p^2z,0)\qquad(z\in R), \qquad [v_j,a]=v_{j+1}.

Since v0∈G=γ1(G)v_0\in G=\gamma_1(G), induction gives vj∈γj+1(G)v_j\in\gamma_{j+1}(G). In particular,

vk+1=(p2k+2,0)≠1,vk+1∈γk+2(G).v_{k+1}=(p^{2k+2},0)\ne1, \qquad v_{k+1}\in\gamma_{k+2}(G).

Thus cl⁡(G)≥k+2\operatorname{cl}(G)\geq k+2. Together with the order calculation and (29), this proves Theorem 1.

References

Preprint · Lean (GitHub)

  1. V. S. Anashin, Mixed identities and mixed varieties of groups, Math. USSR-Sb. 57 (1987), no. 1, 171–182, doi:10.1070/SM1987v057n01ABEH003062.
  1. E. I. Khukhro and V. D. Mazurov (eds.), The Kourovka Notebook: Unsolved problems in group theory, 21st ed., September 2026 update, Problem 10.4, arXiv:1401.0300v46.