Nonattainment of the pp-Jordan exponent: Ep(Γ)=(1,∞)\mathcal E_p(\Gamma)=(1,\infty) for a triangular locally finite group

21.121(a)

Problem

If the infimum of the admissible pp-Jordan exponents of a group is finite, is that infimum itself admissible?

jp(H)=min⁡{[H:N]:N⊴H, N abelian, p∤∣N∣},Ep(Γ)={s:∃J>0 ∀H≤Γ finite, jp(H)≤J∣H∣ps},inf⁡Ep(Γ)∈?Ep(Γ).\begin{gathered} j_p(H)=\min\{[H:N]:N\trianglelefteq H,\ N\text{ abelian},\ p\nmid|N|\},\\ \mathcal E_p(\Gamma)=\{s:\exists J>0\ \forall H\le\Gamma\text{ finite},\ j_p(H)\le J|H|_p^s\},\\ \inf\mathcal E_p(\Gamma)\stackrel{?}{\in}\mathcal E_p(\Gamma). \end{gathered}

The example below has Ep(Γ)=(1,∞)\mathcal E_p(\Gamma)=(1,\infty) for every prescribed prime pp.

The exponent and the construction

Fix a prime pp. For a finite group HH, write ∣H∣p|H|_p for the largest power of pp dividing ∣H∣|H|, and define

jp(H)=min⁡{[H:N]:N⊲H, N abelian, p∤∣N∣}.(1) \tag{1} j_p(H)=\min\{[H:N]:N\lhd H,\ N\text{ abelian},\ p\nmid|N|\}.

For a group Γ\Gamma, set

Ep(Γ)={s∈R:there exists J>0 such that jp(H)≤J∣H∣psfor every finite subgroup H≤Γ}.(2) \tag{2} \mathcal E_p(\Gamma)=\left\{s\in\mathbb R: \begin{array}{l} \text{there exists }J>0\text{ such that }j_p(H)\leq J|H|_p^s\\ \text{for every finite subgroup }H\leq\Gamma \end{array}\right\}.

Its infimum, when finite, is the pp-Jordan exponent. Kourovka Problem 21.121(a) concerns attainment of this infimum (1).

Theorem 1. For every prime pp, there is a countable locally finite subgroup Γ≤GL2(F‾p)\Gamma\leq\mathop{\mathrm{GL}}_2(\overline{\mathbb F}_p) such that all its matrices are upper triangular, its derived length is exactly two, and

Ep(Γ)=(1,∞).\mathcal E_p(\Gamma)=(1,\infty).

In particular, its pp-Jordan exponent is one, but no positive constant works at exponent one.

Put F=F‾pF=\overline{\mathbb F}_p. For k≥5k\geq5, define

dk=k!,mk=Φk!(p),Mk=∏i=5kmi,(4) \tag{4} d_k=k!,\qquad m_k=\Phi_{k!}(p),\qquad M_k=\prod_{i=5}^k m_i,

where Φn(X)\Phi_n(X) is the nnth cyclotomic polynomial. Set Mk=1M_k=1 for k<5k<5, and write μm(F)={a∈F×:am=1}\mu_m(F)=\{a\in F^\times:a^m=1\}. The group in the theorem is

D=⋃k≥5μMk(F),Γ={(ab01):a∈D, b∈F}.(5) \tag{5} D=\bigcup_{k\geq5}\mu_{M_k}(F),\qquad \Gamma=\left\{\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\0&1\end{pmatrix}:a\in D,\ b\in F\right\}.

Every MkM_k is prime to pp, as proved below, and Mk∣Mk+1M_k\mid M_{k+1}. Thus DD is an increasing union of finite cyclic groups.

Cyclotomic values at factorial indices

Lemma 2. For k≥5k\geq5, the following hold:

gcd⁡(mk,k!)=1,mk>k!,ordr(p)=k!(1<r∣mk).\begin{align*} \gcd(m_k,k!)&=1,\qquad m_k>k!,\tag{6a}\\ \mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_r(p)&=k!\qquad(1<r\mid m_k).\tag{6b} \end{align*}

Here ordr(p)\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_r(p) is the multiplicative order of pp modulo rr. The integers mkm_k are pairwise coprime.

Proof. We first recall the elementary cyclotomic reduction rule. If a prime qq divides Φn(p)\Phi_n(p) and n=qafn=q^a f with q∤fq\nmid f, then the image of pp in Fq\mathbb F_q has order ff. Indeed, when a=0a=0, the roots of Φf\Phi_f in characteristic qq are precisely the primitive ffth roots. For a>0a>0, reduction of the cyclotomic factorization, together with Frobenius, gives

Φqaf(X)=Φf(X)qa−1(q−1)in Fq[X].\Phi_{q^a f}(X)=\Phi_f(X)^{q^{a-1}(q-1)}\quad\text{in }\mathbb F_q[X].

Thus its roots are the same primitive ffth roots. In particular f∣q−1f\mid q-1.

Suppose now that q∣mkq\mid m_k and q∣k!q\mid k!. Then q≤kq\leq k, and the qq-free part ff of k!k! divides q−1q-1. If q<5q<5, the factor 55 of k!k! divides ff, which is impossible since f≤q−1<5f\leq q-1<5. If q≥5q\geq5, the integer (q−1)!(q-1)! divides ff, since it is prime to qq and divides k!k!. But (q−1)!>q−1(q-1)!>q-1, again impossible. This proves (6a).

Since Φk!(p)∣pk!−1\Phi_{k!}(p)\mid p^{k!}-1, every divisor rr of mkm_k is prime to pp and ordr(p)∣k!\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_r(p)\mid k!. If r>1r>1, choose a prime q∣rq\mid r. By (6a), q∤k!q\nmid k!, so the reduction rule gives ordq(p)=k!\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_q(p)=k!. As ordq(p)∣ordr(p)\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_q(p)\mid\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_r(p), equality follows, proving (6b). A prime dividing two distinct mi,mjm_i,m_j would give i!=j!i!=j!, which is impossible for i,j≥5i,j\geq5.

Finally, mk>1m_k>1. The complex product for Φk!(p)\Phi_{k!}(p) has all factors p−ζp-\zeta with ζ≠1\zeta\neq1 on the unit circle, so ∣p−ζ∣>p−1≥1|p-\zeta|>p-1\geq1. The value is positive, hence greater than one. Choose a prime q∣mkq\mid m_k. Equation (6b) gives k!∣q−1k!\mid q-1, and therefore mk≥q>k!m_k\geq q>k!. ◻

Lemma 3. If m>1m>1 divides some MjM_j, there is a k≥5k\geq5 such that

ordm(p)=k!,m∣Mk.(8) \tag{8} \mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_m(p)=k!,\qquad m\mid M_k.

Also Mk∣pk!−1M_k\mid p^{k!}-1 for every k≥5k\geq5.

Proof. For i≤ki\leq k, mi∣pi!−1∣pk!−1m_i\mid p^{i!}-1\mid p^{k!}-1. Pairwise coprimality gives the assertion for MkM_k. Choose the least kk with m∣Mkm\mid M_k. Then k≥5k\geq5 and r=gcd⁡(m,mk)>1r=\gcd(m,m_k)>1: otherwise m∣Mk−1mkm\mid M_{k-1}m_k would imply m∣Mk−1m\mid M_{k-1}. Thus

k!=ordr(p)∣ordm(p)∣k!,k!=\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_r(p)\mid\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_m(p)\mid k!,

using Lemma 2 and m∣Mk∣pk!−1m\mid M_k\mid p^{k!}-1. ◻

Uniform growth of the scalar orders

Lemma 4. One has

log⁡Mkk!⟶0.(10) \tag{10} \frac{\log M_k}{k!}\longrightarrow0.

Consequently, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, there is a constant Cε≥1C_\varepsilon\geq1 such that

Mk≤Cεpεk!(k≥5).(11) \tag{11} M_k\leq C_\varepsilon p^{\varepsilon k!}\qquad(k\geq5).

Proof. Euler’s formula and divergence of the sum of reciprocal primes give

φ(k!)k!=∏q≤kq prime(1−1q)≤exp⁡(−∑q≤kq prime1q)⟶0.\frac{\varphi(k!)}{k!}=\prod_{\substack{q\leq k\\q\text{ prime}}}\left(1-\frac1q\right) \leq\exp\left(-\sum_{\substack{q\leq k\\q\text{ prime}}}\frac1q\right)\longrightarrow0.

The complex root product also gives mi≤(p+1)φ(i!)m_i\leq(p+1)^{\varphi(i!)}. Hence

0≤log⁡Mkk!≤log⁡(p+1)∑i=0kφ(i!)k!.(13) \tag{13} 0\leq\frac{\log M_k}{k!} \leq\log(p+1)\frac{\sum_{i=0}^k\varphi(i!)}{k!}.

Induction gives ∑i=0k−1i!≤3(k−1)!\sum_{i=0}^{k-1}i!\leq3(k-1)! for k≥1k\geq1. Since φ(i!)≤i!\varphi(i!)\leq i!,

∑i=0kφ(i!)k!≤φ(k!)k!+3k⟶0.\frac{\sum_{i=0}^k\varphi(i!)}{k!} \leq\frac{\varphi(k!)}{k!}+\frac3k\longrightarrow0.

This proves (10). For sufficiently large kk, it implies log⁡Mk≤εk!log⁡p\log M_k\leq\varepsilon k!\log p. Enlarge the multiplicative constant to include the finitely many earlier indices, proving (11). ◻

Finite affine subgroups

Write an affine element as (a,b)(a,b), with multiplication (a,b)(a′,b′)=(aa′,b+ab′)(a,b)(a',b')=(aa',b+ab'), and let V={(1,b):b∈F}V=\{(1,b):b\in F\}. For finite H≤ΓH\leq\Gamma, put

P=H∩V,B={a:(a,b)∈H for some b},m=∣B∣.P=H\cap V,\qquad B=\{a:(a,b)\in H\text{ for some }b\},\qquad m=|B|.

The group BB is a finite subgroup of F×F^\times, so it is cyclic and has order prime to pp. The kernel PP is elementary abelian. Consequently

∣H∣=∣P∣m,∣H∣p=∣P∣.(16) \tag{16} |H|=|P|m,\qquad |H|_p=|P|.

Lemma 5. If P=1P=1, then jp(H)=1j_p(H)=1. If P≠1P\neq1, then

jp(H)=∣H∣,m∣∣P∣−1.(17) \tag{17} j_p(H)=|H|,\qquad m\mid |P|-1.

In particular, if m>1m>1 and t=ordm(p)t=\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_m(p), then ∣P∣=ptr|P|=p^{tr} for some integer r≥1r\geq1.

Proof. If P=1P=1, projection embeds HH into BB, making HH itself an admissible normal abelian p′p'-subgroup in (1).

Suppose P≠1P\neq1, and let N⊲HN\lhd H have order prime to pp. Since PP is normal, [N,P]⊆N∩P=1[N,P]\subseteq N\cap P=1. Thus NN centralizes every translation in PP. For b≠0b\neq0,

(a,u)(1,b)=(1,b)(a,u)⟺(a−1)b=0⟺a=1.(a,u)(1,b)=(1,b)(a,u)\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad (a-1)b=0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad a=1.

It follows that N⊆PN\subseteq P, and hence N=1N=1. This proves jp(H)=∣H∣j_p(H)=|H|.

Identify PP with a finite additive subgroup W≤FW\leq F and choose a generator aa of BB. Conjugation by any lift of aa permutes W∖{0}W\setminus\{0\} by multiplication by aa. The nonzero product of all elements of this set therefore satisfies

∏w∈W∖{0}w=∏w∈W∖{0}aw=a∣W∣−1∏w∈W∖{0}w.\prod_{w\in W\setminus\{0\}}w =\prod_{w\in W\setminus\{0\}}aw =a^{|W|-1}\prod_{w\in W\setminus\{0\}}w.

Cancellation gives a∣P∣−1=1a^{|P|-1}=1, so m∣∣P∣−1m\mid|P|-1. Write ∣P∣=pu|P|=p^u with u>0u>0. Then ordm(p)∣u\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_m(p)\mid u, giving the last assertion. ◻

The set of admissible exponents

Proof of Theorem 1. Take s=1+ε>1s=1+\varepsilon>1 and CεC_\varepsilon from Lemma 4. For finite H≤ΓH\leq\Gamma, the desired bound follows immediately from Lemma 5 if P=1P=1 or m=1m=1, since Cε≥1C_\varepsilon\geq1.

In the remaining case, m>1m>1. A generator of the cyclic group BB belongs to some μMj(F)\mu_{M_j}(F), so m∣Mjm\mid M_j. Lemma 3 gives k≥5k\geq5 with ordm(p)=k!\mathop{\mathrm{ord}}_m(p)=k! and m≤Mkm\leq M_k. Lemma 5 then implies ∣P∣≥pk!|P|\geq p^{k!}. Therefore

jp(H)=∣P∣m≤∣P∣Mk≤Cε∣P∣pεk!≤Cε∣P∣1+ε=Cε∣H∣ps.j_p(H)=|P|m\leq |P|M_k\leq C_\varepsilon|P|p^{\varepsilon k!} \leq C_\varepsilon|P|^{1+\varepsilon}=C_\varepsilon|H|_p^s.

The constant is independent of HH, so every s>1s>1 is admissible.

The field FF is the countable union of its finite subfields, and every finite subset lies in one of them. Every finitely generated subgroup of Γ\Gamma therefore lies in a finite affine group. Thus Γ\Gamma is countable and locally finite.

Choose ak∈Da_k\in D of order mkm_k. The finite subgroup Hk=⟨(ak,0),(1,1)⟩H_k=\langle(a_k,0),(1,1)\rangle has nontrivial translation subgroup and scalar image of order mkm_k. Hence jp(Hk)=mk∣Hk∣p>k!∣Hk∣pj_p(H_k)=m_k|H_k|_p>k!|H_k|_p, excluding a bound at exponent one. Since ∣H∣p≥1|H|_p\geq1, a bound at any s≤1s\leq1 would imply one at exponent one. Thus Ep(Γ)=(1,∞)\mathcal E_p(\Gamma)=(1,\infty).

Finally, Γ′⊆V\Gamma'\subseteq V since Γ/V\Gamma/V is abelian. For a∈D∖{1}a\in D\setminus\{1\} the identity [(a,0),(1,b)]=(1,(a−1)b)[(a,0),(1,b)]=(1,(a-1)b), with b∈Fb\in F, gives V⊆Γ′V\subseteq\Gamma'. Hence Γ′=V≠1\Gamma'=V\neq1 and Γ′′=1\Gamma''=1, proving that the triangular group (5) has derived length exactly two. ◻

References

Preprint · Lean (GitHub)

  1. E. I. Khukhro and V. D. Mazurov (eds.), Unsolved Problems in Group Theory: The Kourovka Notebook, Problem 21.121(a). arXiv:1401.0300.