Finite traces of group varieties via Fn/⋂kerf and residual quotient closure
Kourovka4.17
Problem
Characterize the classes K of finite groups that occur as all finite members of an ordinary group variety:
K=Vfin={Q∈V:∣Q∣<∞}.
The criterion below uses finite quotients of finitely generated residually-K groups. Residual separation allows arbitrary homomorphisms into members of K.
The residual criterion
An ordinary group variety is a class defined by word identities in the group signature. For such a variety V, write
Vfin={Q∈V:∣Q∣<∞}.
Problem 4.17 of the Kourovka Notebook, due to R. Baer, asks for a characterization of the classes Vfin (2).
Let K be a class of finite groups. A group G is residually-K if
∀g∈G∖{1}∃Q∈K∃f:G⟶Qf(g)=1.(2)
All maps between groups in this article are homomorphisms. The maps in (2) need not be surjective. Consider the condition
G is finitely generated and residually-K,p:G↠Q,∣Q∣<∞}⟹Q∈K.(R)
Theorem 1. For a class K of finite groups, the following are equivalent:
When these conditions hold, one may take V to be the class of all groups satisfying every word identity valid in K.
Here finite generation means the existence of an epimorphism Fn↠G, where Fn=F(x1,…,xn) and n≥0. In particular, the trivial group is allowed. No closure hypothesis on K is imposed. In the implication (1)⇒(2), finite generation of G is unnecessary.
Common laws and residual separation
Regard an identity as a pair (n,w) with w∈Fn; its assertion in G is
G⊨(n,w)⟺f(w)=1for every f:Fn⟶G.(4)
This includes all ordinary group equations: the equation u=v is written as the identity uv−1=1. For a set Σ of such pairs, let Mod(Σ) denote the groups satisfying every member of Σ.
Lemma 2. Let Σ be a set of ordinary identities.
If every member of K satisfies Σ, then every residually-K group satisfies Σ.
If G satisfies Σ and p:G↠H, then H satisfies Σ.
Proof. For the first assertion, fix (n,w)∈Σ and f:Fn→G. If f(w)=1, residual separation gives Q∈K and q:G→Q with qf(w)=1. This contradicts Q⊨(n,w).
For the second assertion, let f:Fn→H. Choose gi∈G with p(gi)=f(xi), and let f:Fn→G send xi to gi. The universal property of Fn gives pf=f. Consequently,
f(w)=p(f(w))=p(1)=1((n,w)∈Σ).
◻
For n≥0, define
Rn(K)=Q∈Kf:Fn→Q⋂kerf,Ln(K)=Fn/Rn(K).(6)
The intersection is a normal subgroup of Fn; an empty intersection means Fn. Put
ΣK={(n,w):n≥0,w∈Rn(K)}.(7)
Thus ΣK is exactly the set of identities common to K. In particular,
Q∈K⟹Q⊨ΣK.(8)
Lemma 3. The group Ln(K) is finitely generated and residually-K.
Proof. The images of x1,…,xn generate Ln(K). Let wRn(K)=1. By (6), there are Q∈K and f:Fn→Q such that f(w)=1. Since Rn(K)≤kerf, the map f induces
f:Ln(K)⟶Q,f(wRn(K))=f(w)=1.
◻
Lemma 4. If G⊨ΣK and p:Fn↠G, then p factors through an epimorphism Ln(K)↠G.
Proof. For w∈Rn(K), the pair (n,w) belongs to ΣK, so (4) gives p(w)=1. Hence Rn(K)≤kerp, and the quotient universal property yields
p:Ln(K)⟶G,p(wRn(K))=p(w).
Every g∈G is p(w) for some w∈Fn, proving surjectivity. ◻
Proof of the characterization
Proof of Theorem 1. Suppose K=Mod(Σ)fin. Let G be residually-K and let p:G↠Q, where Q is finite. By Lemma 2(1), G⊨Σ; by Lemma 2(2), Q⊨Σ. Therefore Q∈K, proving (R).
Conversely, suppose (R) holds and set V=Mod(ΣK). Inclusion K⊆Vfin is (8). If Q∈Vfin, choose a finite generating tuple and its associated epimorphism Fn↠Q. Lemma 4 produces
Ln(K)↠Q.
Lemma 3 shows that its domain is finitely generated and residually-K. Condition (R) now gives Q∈K. Thus
K=Mod(ΣK)fin,
as asserted. ◻
The quotient construction (6) is the group instance of the free-algebra construction in Birkhoff’s variety theorem (1).