Faithful actions C↪Aut⁡(S)C\hookrightarrow\operatorname{Aut}(S) with d(S)≤5d(S)\le5 and S(4)=1S^{(4)}=1

5.39

Problem

Does every countable group embed in the automorphism group of a finitely generated soluble group?

∣C∣≤ℵ0⟹?∃S finitely generated and soluble,C↪Aut⁡(S).|C|\le\aleph_0\quad\stackrel{?}{\Longrightarrow}\quad \exists S\text{ finitely generated and soluble},\quad C\hookrightarrow\operatorname{Aut}(S).

The construction below gives the quantitative bounds d(S)≤5d(S)\le5 and S(4)=1S^{(4)}=1.

Faithful actions with a uniform generator bound

Write S(0)=SS^{(0)}=S and S(n+1)=[S(n),S(n)]S^{(n+1)}=[S^{(n)},S^{(n)}]. The commutator convention is [x,y]=xyx−1y−1[x,y]=xyx^{-1}y^{-1}, and products of operators act from right to left.

Theorem 1. For every countable group CC, there are a group SS, elements s1,…,s5∈Ss_1,\ldots,s_5\in S, and an injective homomorphism ι ⁣:C→Aut⁡(S)\iota\colon C\to\operatorname{Aut}(S) such that

S=⟨s1,…,s5⟩,S(4)=1.S=\langle s_1,\ldots,s_5\rangle,\qquad S^{(4)}=1.

Here countable includes finite groups. Theorem 1 answers Problem 5.39 of the Kourovka Notebook (1), posed by P. M. Neumann. Cyclic modules isomorphic to proper direct powers occur in the representation theory of infinite soluble groups; see Neumann (2).

We construct SS as M⋊(G×Z)M\rtimes(G\times\mathbb Z), where MM is abelian and GG is three-generated with G(3)=1G^{(3)}=1. A three-generated overgroup DD of CC acts faithfully on MM and centralizes the action of G×ZG\times\mathbb Z; its action therefore extends to SS.

A three-generated overgroup

For groups H,QH,Q, use the unrestricted regular wreath product H≀Q=HQ⋊QH\wr Q=H^Q\rtimes Q, where (q⋅f)(x)=f(q−1x)(q\cdot f)(x)=f(q^{-1}x). Write δq(h)\delta_q(h) for the base function equal to hh at qq and to 11 elsewhere.

Lemma 2. Every countable group embeds in a group generated by three elements.

Proof. Choose a surjection N→C\mathbb N\to C, n↦cnn\mapsto c_n. In H=C≀ZH=C\wr\mathbb Z, let zz denote the unit shift and define

hc(k)={ck≥0,1k<0.[hc,z]=δ0(c).h_c(k)=\begin{cases}c&k\ge0,\\1&k<0.\end{cases} \qquad [h_c,z]=\delta_0(c).

The commutator identity follows by evaluating hc(k)hc(k−1)−1h_c(k)h_c(k-1)^{-1} at every integer kk.

In Z2\mathbb Z^2, put pn=(n,n2)p_n=(n,n^2). Nonzero differences between these points are unique. Indeed, if pi−pj=pk−plp_i-p_j=p_k-p_l and i≠ji\ne j, then

i−j=k−l≠0,(i−j)(i+j)=(k−l)(k+l),i-j=k-l\ne0,\qquad (i-j)(i+j)=(k-l)(k+l),

so i+j=k+li+j=k+l, and hence i=ki=k, j=lj=l.

Define f∈HZ2f\in H^{\mathbb Z^2} by

f(p0)=z,f(pn+1)=hcn,f(x)=1(x∉{pn:n≥0}).f(p_0)=z,\qquad f(p_{n+1})=h_{c_n},\qquad f(x)=1\quad\bigl(x\notin\{p_n:n\ge0\}\bigr).

Let x,yx,y be the two coordinate shifts in H≀Z2H\wr\mathbb Z^2 and set D=⟨f,x,y⟩D=\langle f,x,y\rangle. For n≥0n\ge0, the supports of ff and its translate by pn+1p_{n+1} can meet only at pn+1p_{n+1}. This follows from uniqueness of the difference pn+1−p0p_{n+1}-p_0. At this point their values are hcnh_{c_n} and zz. Thus

[f, pn+1fpn+1−1]=δpn+1(δ0(cn)).[f,\,p_{n+1}fp_{n+1}^{-1}] =\delta_{p_{n+1}}\bigl(\delta_0(c_n)\bigr).

Here a lattice point denotes the corresponding product of powers of x,yx,y. Conjugation by its inverse moves the displayed base element to the origin. Consequently DD contains δ0(δ0(c))\delta_0(\delta_0(c)) for every c∈Cc\in C. This double-coordinate map is a homomorphism and is injective by evaluation at the two origins. ◻

A cyclic module isomorphic to eight copies of itself

Let K=F3K=\mathbb F_3 and W=⨁q∈QKεqW=\bigoplus_{q\in\mathbb Q}K\varepsilon_q. Define invertible KK-linear operators by

aεq={−εqq∈Z,εqq∉Z,bεq=εq+1,dεq=ε2q.(6) \tag{6} a\varepsilon_q= \begin{cases}-\varepsilon_q&q\in\mathbb Z,\\ \varepsilon_q&q\notin\mathbb Z,\end{cases} \qquad b\varepsilon_q=\varepsilon_{q+1},\qquad d\varepsilon_q=\varepsilon_{2q}.

More precisely, let GG be the subgroup generated by the corresponding three elements in the signed affine group

(K×)Q⋊Aff⁡(Q).(K^\times)^{\mathbb Q}\rtimes\operatorname{Aff}(\mathbb Q).

The sign group is abelian. The affine group has abelian translation kernel and abelian linear quotient Q×\mathbb Q^\times, so

G=⟨a,b,d⟩,G(3)=1.(8) \tag{8} G=\langle a,b,d\rangle,\qquad G^{(3)}=1.

Use the same letters for their represented operators. Let RR be the unital subring of End⁡K(W)\operatorname{End}_K(W) generated by the image of GG. For g∈Gg\in G, the operator representing g−1g^{-1} also lies in RR, so the representation takes values in R×R^\times.

Lemma 3. Put e=a−1∈Re=a-1\in R and, for 0≤i<80\le i<8, put

ui=bid3e,vi=ed−3b−i.u_i=b^i d^3e,\qquad v_i=e d^{-3}b^{-i}.

Then e2=e≠0e^2=e\ne0 and

uie=ui,vie=vi,viuj=δije,∑i=07uivi=e.(10) \tag{10} u_i e=u_i,\qquad v_i e=v_i,\qquad v_i u_j=\delta_{ij}e,\qquad \sum_{i=0}^7u_i v_i=e.

Proof. In characteristic three, −1−1=1-1-1=1, so ee is the projection onto the integer coordinates of WW. In particular eε0=ε0≠0e\varepsilon_0= \varepsilon_0\ne0. On basis vectors,

uiεq={ε8q+iq∈Z,0q∉Z,viεq={ε(q−i)/8(q−i)/8∈Z,0otherwise.\begin{align*} u_i\varepsilon_q&= \begin{cases}\varepsilon_{8q+i}&q\in\mathbb Z,\\0&q\notin\mathbb Z,\end{cases}\\ v_i\varepsilon_q&= \begin{cases}\varepsilon_{(q-i)/8}&(q-i)/8\in\mathbb Z,\\0&\text{otherwise}.\end{cases} \end{align*}

The first two relations follow, since (q−i)/8∈Z(q-i)/8\in\mathbb Z implies q∈Zq\in\mathbb Z. For integer nn and 0≤i,j<80\le i,j<8, (8n+j−i)/8(8n+j-i)/8 is integral exactly when i=ji=j. This proves the third relation. Each integer has a unique expression 8n+i8n+i with 0≤i<80\le i<8, and no noninteger has such an expression. Hence the operators uiviu_i v_i are the eight disjoint residue-class projections whose sum is ee. ◻

Proposition 4. The left RR-module V=ReV=Re is nonzero and cyclic, and

Φ ⁣:V⟶V8,v⟼(vui)i=07(12) \tag{12} \Phi\colon V\longrightarrow V^8,\quad v\longmapsto(vu_i)_{i=0}^7

is an RR-linear isomorphism, with inverse Ψ((wi))=∑iwivi\Psi((w_i))=\sum_i w_i v_i.

Proof. The left ideal is Re={v∈R:ve=v}Re=\{v\in R:ve=v\}, with nonzero generator ee. Since uie=uiu_i e=u_i and vie=viv_i e=v_i, right multiplication by uiu_i or viv_i maps ReRe into ReRe. Right multiplication commutes with the left RR-action, so the maps are RR-linear. The remaining relations give

ΨΦ(v)=v∑iuivi=ve=v,(ΦΨ((wi)))j=∑iwiviuj=wje=wj.\Psi\Phi(v)=v\sum_i u_i v_i=ve=v,\qquad (\Phi\Psi((w_i)))_j=\sum_i w_i v_i u_j=w_j e=w_j.

 ◻

Transport and a faithful quotient

Fix D=⟨r1,r2,r3⟩D=\langle r_1,r_2,r_3\rangle containing CC, as in Lemma 2. Let

(σ0,…,σ7)=(1,r1,r1−1,r2,r2−1,r3,r3−1,1).(\sigma_0,\ldots,\sigma_7) =(1,r_1,r_1^{-1},r_2,r_2^{-1},r_3,r_3^{-1},1).

These are eight labelled entries; coincidences among their values are allowed. Write πi ⁣:V→V\pi_i\colon V\to V for the iith component of Φ\Phi and ji ⁣:V→Vj_i\colon V\to V for the inverse image under Φ\Phi of the iith coordinate inclusion. Thus πkji=δki1V\pi_k j_i=\delta_{ki}1_V.

On the algebraic direct sum A=⨁q∈DVA=\bigoplus_{q\in D}V, define

T(δq(v))=∑i=07δqσi(πi(v)),Lcδq(v)=δcq(v),ξ=δ1(e).(15) \tag{15} T(\delta_q(v))=\sum_{i=0}^7\delta_{q\sigma_i}(\pi_i(v)), \qquad L_c\delta_q(v)=\delta_{cq}(v),\qquad \xi=\delta_1(e).

Both maps are RR-linear, and TLc=LcTT L_c=L_c T because (cq)σi=c(qσi)(cq)\sigma_i=c(q\sigma_i).

Lemma 5. The map TT is surjective. The only RR-submodule of AA containing ξ\xi and preserved by TT is AA. There is r∈Rr\in R such that

rTξ=ξ.(16) \tag{16} rT\xi=\xi.

Proof. The component relations give, even when some labels coincide,

T(δq(ji(v)))=δqσi(v).(17) \tag{17} T\bigl(\delta_q(j_i(v))\bigr)=\delta_{q\sigma_i}(v).

Taking i=0i=0 proves surjectivity on every summand and hence on AA. If a submodule NN contains ξ\xi, cyclicity of VV gives δ1(V)⊆N\delta_1(V)\subseteq N. Equation (17) and TT-invariance then give δqσi(V)⊆N\delta_{q\sigma_i}(V)\subseteq N whenever δq(V)⊆N\delta_q(V)\subseteq N. Every element of DD is a word in the labels, so NN contains every summand. Finally choose r∈Rr\in R with re=j0(e)re=j_0(e). By RR-linearity of TT,

rTξ=T(rξ)=T(δ1(j0(e)))=ξ.rT\xi=T(r\xi)=T\bigl(\delta_1(j_0(e))\bigr)=\xi.

 ◻

Put

N=⋃n≥0ker⁡Tn,M=A/N,μ=ξ+N.(19) \tag{19} N=\bigcup_{n\ge0}\ker T^n,\qquad M=A/N,\qquad \mu=\xi+N.

The kernels form an increasing chain of RR-submodules, so NN is a submodule. Moreover Tx∈NTx\in N if and only if x∈Nx\in N.

Proposition 6. The map TT induces an RR-linear automorphism tt of MM. Left translation induces a faithful homomorphism D→Aut⁡R(M)D\to\operatorname{Aut}_R(M) commuting with tt, and μ≠0\mu\ne0. Every tt-invariant RR-submodule of MM containing μ\mu equals MM.

Proof. The equivalence Tx∈N⟺x∈NTx\in N\Longleftrightarrow x\in N gives injectivity of the induced map; surjectivity follows from that of TT. Each LcL_c and its inverse commute with TT, and therefore preserve NN, giving an action by RR-linear automorphisms of MM. Its commutation with tt descends from (15).

The recovery identity iterates to

rnTnξ=ξ(n≥0).(20) \tag{20} r^nT^n\xi=\xi\qquad(n\ge0).

This follows inductively from RR-linearity of TT; commutativity of RR is not required. Since ξ≠0\xi\ne0, no TnξT^n\xi is zero, and therefore μ≠0\mu\ne0.

Suppose Lcμ=μL_c\mu=\mu. Then Tn(Lcξ−ξ)=0T^n(L_c\xi-\xi)=0 for some nn. The map LcL_c is RR-linear and commutes with TT, so multiplying this equality by rnr^n and using (20) gives

Lcξ−ξ=0.L_c\xi-\xi=0.

For c≠1c\ne1, evaluation at cc would instead give e≠0e\ne0. Thus c=1c=1, proving faithfulness. Finally the preimage in AA of a tt-invariant submodule containing μ\mu contains ξ\xi and is TT-invariant. Lemma 5 makes that preimage all of AA. ◻

The soluble group and its automorphisms

The group GG acts on MM through the units of RR, and tt commutes with that action by RR-linearity. Thus G×ZG\times\mathbb Z acts by

(g,n)⋅m=ρ(g)tn(m),(g,n)\cdot m=\rho(g)t^n(m),

where ρ ⁣:G→R×\rho\colon G\to R^\times is the given representation. Form the semidirect product

S=M⋊(G×Z).(23) \tag{23} S=M\rtimes(G\times\mathbb Z).

We identify μ∈M\mu\in M, a,b,d∈Ga,b,d\in G and the unit generator t∈Zt\in\mathbb Z with their natural images in SS.

Proposition 7. The group SS satisfies

S=⟨μ,a,b,d,t⟩,S(4)=1.S=\langle\mu,a,b,d,t\rangle,\qquad S^{(4)}=1.

The action of DD on MM extends faithfully to automorphisms of SS that fix G×ZG\times\mathbb Z pointwise.

Proof. Let H=⟨μ,a,b,d,t⟩≤SH=\langle\mu,a,b,d,t\rangle\le S. It contains G×ZG\times\mathbb Z. Its intersection with the additive normal subgroup MM contains μ\mu and is closed under conjugation by GG and tt. Thus H∩MH\cap M is closed under the operators ρ(g)\rho(g) and under tt. Since it is an additive subgroup, it is also closed under integer multiples, sums, differences and compositions of the operators ρ(g)\rho(g). These generate RR, so H∩MH\cap M is an RR-submodule. Proposition 6 gives H∩M=MH\cap M=M, and hence H=SH=S.

By (8), (G×Z)(3)=1(G\times\mathbb Z)^{(3)}=1. The image of S(3)S^{(3)} in S/MS/M is therefore trivial. Thus S(3)≤MS^{(3)}\le M, and S(4)=1S^{(4)}=1 since MM is abelian.

For c∈Dc\in D, define

αc(m,(g,n))=(Lcm,(g,n)).\alpha_c\bigl(m,(g,n)\bigr)=\bigl(L_c m,(g,n)\bigr).

The RR-linearity of LcL_c and Lct=tLcL_ct=tL_c give Lc((g,n)⋅m)=(g,n)⋅Lc(m)L_c((g,n)\cdot m)=(g,n)\cdot L_c(m), so αc\alpha_c preserves the semidirect-product multiplication. Its inverse is αc−1\alpha_{c^{-1}}, and αcαd=αcd\alpha_c\alpha_d=\alpha_{cd}. If αc=1\alpha_c=1, its restriction to MM is the identity; Proposition 6 then gives c=1c=1. ◻

Proof of Theorem 1. Compose the embedding C↪DC\hookrightarrow D from Lemma 2 with the faithful homomorphism D→Aut⁡(S)D\to\operatorname{Aut}(S) of Proposition 7. The generating set and the equality S(4)=1S^{(4)}=1 also follow from Proposition 7. ◻

References

Preprint · Lean (GitHub)

  1. E. I. Khukhro and V. D. Mazurov (eds.), Unsolved Problems in Group Theory: The Kourovka Notebook, 21st ed., 2026, Problem 5.39. arXiv:1401.0300.
  1. P. M. Neumann, Pathology in the representation theory of infinite soluble groups, in A. C. Kim and B. H. Neumann (eds.), Groups–Korea 1988, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1398, Springer, Berlin, 1989, 124–139. doi:10.1007/BFb0086249.