Problem
Does every countable group embed in the automorphism group of a finitely generated soluble group?
∣C∣≤ℵ0⟹?∃S finitely generated and soluble,C↪Aut(S).
The construction below gives the quantitative bounds d(S)≤5 and S(4)=1.
Write S(0)=S and S(n+1)=[S(n),S(n)]. The commutator convention is [x,y]=xyx−1y−1, and products of operators act from right to left.
Theorem 1. For every countable group C, there are a group S, elements s1,…,s5∈S, and an injective homomorphism ι:C→Aut(S) such that
S=⟨s1,…,s5⟩,S(4)=1.
Here countable includes finite groups. Theorem 1 answers Problem 5.39 of the Kourovka Notebook (1), posed by P. M. Neumann. Cyclic modules isomorphic to proper direct powers occur in the representation theory of infinite soluble groups; see Neumann (2).
We construct S as M⋊(G×Z), where M is abelian and G is three-generated with G(3)=1. A three-generated overgroup D of C acts faithfully on M and centralizes the action of G×Z; its action therefore extends to S.
A three-generated overgroup
For groups H,Q, use the unrestricted regular wreath product H≀Q=HQ⋊Q, where (q⋅f)(x)=f(q−1x). Write δq(h) for the base function equal to h at q and to 1 elsewhere.
Lemma 2. Every countable group embeds in a group generated by three elements.
Proof. Choose a surjection N→C, n↦cn. In H=C≀Z, let z denote the unit shift and define
hc(k)={c1k≥0,k<0.[hc,z]=δ0(c).The commutator identity follows by evaluating hc(k)hc(k−1)−1 at every integer k.
In Z2, put pn=(n,n2). Nonzero differences between these points are unique. Indeed, if pi−pj=pk−pl and i=j, then
i−j=k−l=0,(i−j)(i+j)=(k−l)(k+l),so i+j=k+l, and hence i=k, j=l.
Define f∈HZ2 by
f(p0)=z,f(pn+1)=hcn,f(x)=1(x∈/{pn:n≥0}).Let x,y be the two coordinate shifts in H≀Z2 and set D=⟨f,x,y⟩. For n≥0, the supports of f and its translate by pn+1 can meet only at pn+1. This follows from uniqueness of the difference pn+1−p0. At this point their values are hcn and z. Thus
[f,pn+1fpn+1−1]=δpn+1(δ0(cn)).Here a lattice point denotes the corresponding product of powers of x,y. Conjugation by its inverse moves the displayed base element to the origin. Consequently D contains δ0(δ0(c)) for every c∈C. This double-coordinate map is a homomorphism and is injective by evaluation at the two origins. ◻
A cyclic module isomorphic to eight copies of itself
Let K=F3 and W=⨁q∈QKεq. Define invertible K-linear operators by
aεq={−εqεqq∈Z,q∈/Z,bεq=εq+1,dεq=ε2q.(6)
More precisely, let G be the subgroup generated by the corresponding three elements in the signed affine group
(K×)Q⋊Aff(Q).
The sign group is abelian. The affine group has abelian translation kernel and abelian linear quotient Q×, so
G=⟨a,b,d⟩,G(3)=1.(8)
Use the same letters for their represented operators. Let R be the unital subring of EndK(W) generated by the image of G. For g∈G, the operator representing g−1 also lies in R, so the representation takes values in R×.
Lemma 3. Put e=a−1∈R and, for 0≤i<8, put
ui=bid3e,vi=ed−3b−i.
Then e2=e=0 and
uie=ui,vie=vi,viuj=δije,i=0∑7uivi=e.(10)
Proof. In characteristic three, −1−1=1, so e is the projection onto the integer coordinates of W. In particular eε0=ε0=0. On basis vectors,
uiεqviεq={ε8q+i0q∈Z,q∈/Z,={ε(q−i)/80(q−i)/8∈Z,otherwise.The first two relations follow, since (q−i)/8∈Z implies q∈Z. For integer n and 0≤i,j<8, (8n+j−i)/8 is integral exactly when i=j. This proves the third relation. Each integer has a unique expression 8n+i with 0≤i<8, and no noninteger has such an expression. Hence the operators uivi are the eight disjoint residue-class projections whose sum is e. ◻
Proposition 4. The left R-module V=Re is nonzero and cyclic, and
Φ:V⟶V8,v⟼(vui)i=07(12)
is an R-linear isomorphism, with inverse Ψ((wi))=∑iwivi.
Proof. The left ideal is Re={v∈R:ve=v}, with nonzero generator e. Since uie=ui and vie=vi, right multiplication by ui or vi maps Re into Re. Right multiplication commutes with the left R-action, so the maps are R-linear. The remaining relations give
ΨΦ(v)=vi∑uivi=ve=v,(ΦΨ((wi)))j=i∑wiviuj=wje=wj. ◻
Transport and a faithful quotient
Fix D=⟨r1,r2,r3⟩ containing C, as in Lemma 2. Let
(σ0,…,σ7)=(1,r1,r1−1,r2,r2−1,r3,r3−1,1).
These are eight labelled entries; coincidences among their values are allowed. Write πi:V→V for the ith component of Φ and ji:V→V for the inverse image under Φ of the ith coordinate inclusion. Thus πkji=δki1V.
On the algebraic direct sum A=⨁q∈DV, define
T(δq(v))=i=0∑7δqσi(πi(v)),Lcδq(v)=δcq(v),ξ=δ1(e).(15)
Both maps are R-linear, and TLc=LcT because (cq)σi=c(qσi).
Lemma 5. The map T is surjective. The only R-submodule of A containing ξ and preserved by T is A. There is r∈R such that
rTξ=ξ.(16)
Proof. The component relations give, even when some labels coincide,
T(δq(ji(v)))=δqσi(v).(17)Taking i=0 proves surjectivity on every summand and hence on A. If a submodule N contains ξ, cyclicity of V gives δ1(V)⊆N. Equation (17) and T-invariance then give δqσi(V)⊆N whenever δq(V)⊆N. Every element of D is a word in the labels, so N contains every summand. Finally choose r∈R with re=j0(e). By R-linearity of T,
rTξ=T(rξ)=T(δ1(j0(e)))=ξ. ◻
Put
N=n≥0⋃kerTn,M=A/N,μ=ξ+N.(19)
The kernels form an increasing chain of R-submodules, so N is a submodule. Moreover Tx∈N if and only if x∈N.
Proposition 6. The map T induces an R-linear automorphism t of M. Left translation induces a faithful homomorphism D→AutR(M) commuting with t, and μ=0. Every t-invariant R-submodule of M containing μ equals M.
Proof. The equivalence Tx∈N⟺x∈N gives injectivity of the induced map; surjectivity follows from that of T. Each Lc and its inverse commute with T, and therefore preserve N, giving an action by R-linear automorphisms of M. Its commutation with t descends from (15).
The recovery identity iterates to
rnTnξ=ξ(n≥0).(20)This follows inductively from R-linearity of T; commutativity of R is not required. Since ξ=0, no Tnξ is zero, and therefore μ=0.
Suppose Lcμ=μ. Then Tn(Lcξ−ξ)=0 for some n. The map Lc is R-linear and commutes with T, so multiplying this equality by rn and using (20) gives
Lcξ−ξ=0.For c=1, evaluation at c would instead give e=0. Thus c=1, proving faithfulness. Finally the preimage in A of a t-invariant submodule containing μ contains ξ and is T-invariant. Lemma 5 makes that preimage all of A. ◻
The soluble group and its automorphisms
The group G acts on M through the units of R, and t commutes with that action by R-linearity. Thus G×Z acts by
(g,n)⋅m=ρ(g)tn(m),
where ρ:G→R× is the given representation. Form the semidirect product
S=M⋊(G×Z).(23)
We identify μ∈M, a,b,d∈G and the unit generator t∈Z with their natural images in S.
Proposition 7. The group S satisfies
S=⟨μ,a,b,d,t⟩,S(4)=1.
The action of D on M extends faithfully to automorphisms of S that fix G×Z pointwise.
Proof. Let H=⟨μ,a,b,d,t⟩≤S. It contains G×Z. Its intersection with the additive normal subgroup M contains μ and is closed under conjugation by G and t. Thus H∩M is closed under the operators ρ(g) and under t. Since it is an additive subgroup, it is also closed under integer multiples, sums, differences and compositions of the operators ρ(g). These generate R, so H∩M is an R-submodule. Proposition 6 gives H∩M=M, and hence H=S.
By (8), (G×Z)(3)=1. The image of S(3) in S/M is therefore trivial. Thus S(3)≤M, and S(4)=1 since M is abelian.
For c∈D, define
αc(m,(g,n))=(Lcm,(g,n)).The R-linearity of Lc and Lct=tLc give Lc((g,n)⋅m)=(g,n)⋅Lc(m), so αc preserves the semidirect-product multiplication. Its inverse is αc−1, and αcαd=αcd. If αc=1, its restriction to M is the identity; Proposition 6 then gives c=1. ◻
Proof of Theorem 1. Compose the embedding C↪D from Lemma 2 with the faithful homomorphism D→Aut(S) of Proposition 7. The generating set and the equality S(4)=1 also follow from Proposition 7. ◻
References
Preprint · Lean (GitHub)
- E. I. Khukhro and V. D. Mazurov (eds.), Unsolved Problems in Group Theory: The Kourovka Notebook, 21st ed., 2026, Problem 5.39. arXiv:1401.0300.
- P. M. Neumann, Pathology in the representation theory of infinite soluble groups, in A. C. Kim and B. H. Neumann (eds.), Groups–Korea 1988, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1398, Springer, Berlin, 1989, 124–139. doi:10.1007/BFb0086249.